Keynes Versus Hayek - 935 Words

Keynes versus Hayek There are differences between Keynes and Hayek on the role of savings in the economy. Keynes believed that it was a waste to save money, it only lead to destruction and prevent economic growth. He didn’t agree with private investment. He felt by keeping money in your pocket is senseless because soon we will all be dead. You can’t take the money with you. He also felt that the government should increase spending during times of recessions. In contrast, Hayek believed that you must save money so that you could later invest the money wisely. He felt time would multiply your interest. He felt that time did not matter. He believed the same principles of the economy that applied in the 1920 still applied in 2005.†¦show more content†¦Hayek disagreed with war. He felt that war should not be a tool to stimulate the economy. He felt that it only destroyed other economies leaving them in despair. He felt that Keynes did not address the true issues. He stated that consumption shrank and scarce resources were misused. Keynes stated that people were taken off production jobs to be employed by the military. He felt the investment made in wars would not correct market failures and would not assure an equitable distribution of income. He felt more damage was done that good. [Keynes] Are you kidding? My cure works perfectly fine. Have a look. The recession ended in ’09. I deserve credit. Things would have been worse. All the estimates prove it. I’ll go chapter and verse. We could have done better if we’d only spent more. Too bad that only happens when there’s a world war. You can carp all you want about stats and regression. Do you deny that world war cut short the depression? [Hayek] Wow. One data point and you’re jumping for joy. The last time I checked wars only destroy. There was no multiplier. Consumption just shrank As we used scarce resources for every new tank. Pretty perverse to call that prosperity. Ration meat. Ration butter. A life of austerity. When that war spending ended, your friends cried disaster. Yet the economy thrived and grew faster. Creating employment is a straight forward craft When the nation’s at war andShow MoreRelatedEssay on John Maynard Keynes Versus Friederich A. Hayek603 Words   |  3 Pagesof the early twentieth century, John Maynard Keynes and Friedrich A. Hayek, hold very different economic viewpoints. Keynes is among the most famous economic philosophers. Keynes, whos theories gained a reputation during the Great Depression in the 1930s, focused mainly on an economys bust. It is where the economy declines and finally bottoms-out, that Keynesian economics believes the answers lie for its eventual recovery. On the other hand, Hayek believed that in studying the boom answers wouldRead MoreKeynes Vs Hayek Essay804 Words   |  4 PagesKeynes Versus Hayek The relationship between economists John M. Keynes and Friedrich A. Hayek is quite complex. Both had influential roles in economic studies, emerging after World War II and during the Great Depression era (BBC). It’s important to note that both of these economists had opposing views when it came to economic theories and policies. Briefly summed up, Keynes theories were in support for government involvement in the economy (EconedLink). In contrast, Hayek argued that the governmentRead MoreThe Mind And The Market By Jerry Muller Essay2156 Words   |  9 Pages capitalism, and the common good for people. Some of the intellectuals Muller referenced are: Voltaire, Adam Smith, Justus Moser, Edmund Bruke, Hegel, Karl Marx, Matthew Arnold, Weber, Simmel, Sombart, Luckas and Freyer, Schumpter, Keynes, Marcuse, and Friedrich Hayek. Muller s work includes numerous ideas, theories, and plans for the future from these well-known intellectuals. There are many topics included in Muller s work. One topic explored is individuals and corporations involved in theRead MoreDefination of Globalisation12291 Words   |  50 PagesCompany, 1998), p. 327, as cited in V. S. A. Kumar, â€Å"A Critical Methodology of Globalization: Politics of st the 21 Century?†, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, Vol. 10, Issue 2, Summer 2003, pp. 87-111, p. 98. Herman E. Daly, â€Å"Globalization Versus Internationalization: Some Implications†, Global Policy Forum, 1999, see http://www.globalpolicy.org/globaliz/econ/herman2.htm. â€Å"Globalization refers to global economic integration of many formerly national economies into one global economy, mainlyRead MorePrinciples of Microeconomics Fifth Canadian Edition20085 Words   |  81 PagesSecond Model: The Production Possibilities Frontier 26 Microeconomics and Macroeconomics 28 The Economist as Policy Adviser 30 Positive versus Normative Analysis 30 Economists in Ottawa 31 IN THE NEWS: Super Bowl Economics 33 CASE STUDY: Mr. Mankiw Goes to Washington Why Economists Disagree 35 Differences in Scientific Judgments 35 Differences in Values 36 Perception versus Reality 36 IN THE NEWS: Environmental Economists 34 37 viii NEL Copyright 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights ReservedRead MoreMCMULLEN SHEPHERD Entrepreneurial Act13331 Words   |  54 Pagesexercised to make a decision between alternative courses of action that take place in an uncertain future. Although many scholars have emphasized the individual’s exercising of judgment under uncertainty in the form of a decision (e.g., Cantillon, Cole, Keynes, Marshall, Menger, Schultz, Shackle, etc.), it is important to note that a decision is a necessary but insufficient condition for the occurrence of entrepreneurship. We return to the basic realization that entrepreneurship requires one not just toRead MoreGame Theory and Economic Analyst83847 Words   |  336 Pagesthe contributors Contents List of contributors Introduction CHRISTIAN SCHMIDT PART I Historical insight 1 Von Neumann and Morgenstern in historical perspective ROBERT W. DIMAND AND MARY ANN DIMAND 2 Rupture versus continuity in game theory: Nash versus Von Neumann and Morgenstern CHRISTIAN SCHMIDT PART II Theoretical content 3 Bluï ¬â‚¬ and reputation SYLVAIN SORIN 4 An appraisal of cooperative game theory HERVÉ MOULIN 5 The coalition concept in game theory SÉBASTIEN